The Federal Reserve appears to be stuck in an endless cycle.
One of leaving interest rates too low for too long, creating market bubbles, seeing those bubbles pop, leading to stock market downturns and sometimes recession, leading to a lowering of rates again despite the central bank’s stated desire to “normalize” them.
The Fed is mired in that conundrum with the market expecting at least four rate hikes this year to tame inflation just as economic growth is slowing and investors are getting anxious.
PhD Economist and fund manager Danielle Lacalle examines the Fed’s rate hike cycles over the years, how the major stock indices reacted, and whether the cycle continues this time.
**
After every recession, central banks keep rates too low for too long even in growth periods because policymakers’ fear asset price corrections, and this leads to complacency and the creation of bubbles everywhere.
Once policymakers decide to raise rates, they often cause a recession because the amount of risk taken by even the most conservative investor or household is simply too high.
By the time that central banks decide to finally raise rates the bubbles are already more than a market headline, but a dangerous and widespread accumulation of risk that negatively affects millions of unsuspecting citizens.
The question is what is worse, the rate cuts or the rate hikes?
The boom-and-bust cycle is more severe and frequent, as we have seen since the late seventies.
That is why central banks never truly normalize policy, rates remain in negative territory in real terms.
And investors know it.
That is why there is a perverse incentive for households, businesses, and investors to buy any correction.
The fear of interest rate hikes allows us to analyze what has happened in other similar periods:
- Between 1985 and 1990 the Fed raised rates 325 basis points and the S&P 500 rose 45%.
- The rate hike cycle drove emerging economies like Mexico to the ground and states like California went bankrupt.
- Between 1993 and 2000 the Fed also raised rates by 325 basis points and the US stock market shot up 225%.
- In that period, we saw the Tech bubble burst and the early 2000s recession.
- In the 2003 to 2007 period the Fed raised rates by 375 basis points and the market rose 30%.
- It brought the great financial crisis and the housing bubble burst.
- Between 2015 and 2020, rates rose 200 basis points and the US index advanced 65%.
- In that period, in 2018, we saw the Fed change its rate-hike course rapidly after a market correction.
Will the Federal Reserve change its rate hike plan again this time?
History shows us that central banks care much more about risky assets – stocks and bonds – than they say and certainly a lot more than they do about inflation.
At the beginning of 2016, faced with a cycle of expected rate hikes, the S&P500 corrected 11.3% until January 20th.
The Federal Reserve ended up raising rates just once that year despite announcing four hikes. Why did they change? “Geopolitical risk and weakening financial conditions”. Exactly what is happening now.
In December 2018, after years of a bull market, the US stock market fell by 9%, and on January 3rd, 2019, it corrected another 3.5%.
The next day, the Federal Reserve announced that it was “going to be patient” and stopped its rate hike path on its tracks.
It is true that inflation was not 7% then and the Federal Reserve may probably be more tolerant of a market correction than when the US CPI was 3%, but we cannot forget that history shows us that central banks always maintain looser conditions than it seems from their messages and headlines.
The evidence of the United States economic slowdown is everywhere.
- Retail sales
- Job creation
- Stagnant labor force participation
- Declining real wages
- Slowing capital expenditure
- Rise in energy commodities due to the Ukraine tensions
The Federal Reserve is aware of the “bubble of everything” created in recent years and the elevated levels of debt throughout the economy.
Unfortunately, the Fed has already left rates low, and asset purchases high, for too long to prevent an inevitable negative economic effect.
Even worse, the solution will likely be to repeat the same policies that created the conditions for excess.
**
Related stories: How to Protect Your investments From Inflation